FAST FOOD NEWS: Burger King Spicy Big Fish Sandwich and Spicy BLT Whopper

BK Spicy Big Fish Sandwich

Burger King’s Big Fish Sandwich is back, and it’s brought along a spicy sibling. The Spicy Big Fish Sandwich features the same 100 percent White Alaskan Pollock coated with panko breading, pickles, lettuce, and toasted brioche-style bun found with the original Big Fish, but it has a creamy spicy sauce instead of tartar sauce.

The Spicy Big Fish Sandwich has 470 calories, 24 grams of fat, 4 grams of saturated fat, 0 grams of trans fat, 0 milligrams of cholesterol, 1150 milligrams of sodium, 50 grams of carbohydrates, 6 grams of sugar, and 15 grams of protein.

BK Spicy BLT Whopper

But the Spicy Big Fish is not the only new spicy item Burger King want to burn our mouths with. They’ve also introduced the Spicy BLT Whopper. It’s made up of a 1/4 lb patty, American cheese, spicy bacon sauce, lettuce, tomatoes, onion, pickles, and smoked bacon on a toasted sesame seed bun.

The Spicy BLT Whopper has 750 calories, 46 grams of fat, 17 grams of saturated fat, 2 grams of trans fat, 100 milligrams of cholesterol, 1480 milligrams of sodium, 48 grams of carbohydrates, 8 grams of sugar, and 29 grams of protein.

If you’ve tried either one, let us know what you think of it in the comments.

(Images via Burger King’s website.)

One thought to “FAST FOOD NEWS: Burger King Spicy Big Fish Sandwich and Spicy BLT Whopper”

  1. I just tried the Spicy Big Fish today, and almost had a heart attack (literally!) upon seeing the thing has 30 grams of trans fat. Checked the website and it should be 30 grams of cholesterol, 0 grams of trans fat. 🙂 Phew!

    Anyway, I liked it. The sauce was really good, not overly spicy, just enough of a kick. I prefer things to be super super spicy and usually the sauce at ff places is too bland. They put a lot of it on both sides of the bun. The fish patty was standard, just a giant flat fish stick basically, and the lettuce was actually decent. I really enjoyed the bun a lot. Might not be for everyone but I would probably get this again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *