Are chocolate covered potato chips a snack or dessert? This is a serious life question. Dessert has my vote, although you could certainly make the case for either.
For me, the automatic draw to the Lay’s Wavy Milk Chocolate Covered Potato Chips with Almond Bits was the fact it was covered in chocolate. Sadly, though, that’s the peak of the excitement.
There were three major bummers when I opened the bag.
- These Lay’s lived up to the classic chip/pretzel stereotype where the bag looks full but in reality it’s not. This one was about 1/4 of the bag full and the rest was good old zero calorie air. Strike One.
- The chocolate didn’t even cover the entire potato chip, unless the chip was on the smaller side. Strike Two.
- Where were all the almond bits? They might as well have been non-existent, both on the chip and in taste. But we’ll get to taste in a minute. Strike Three.
And to throw in a fourth: The serving size on these puppies is super small. Five chips? I definitely could polish off the whole bag.
I still wanted to give them a fair chance despite the aforementioned bummers. The best part about these chips is the chocolate. It’s pretty darn good. The chocolate covering the chips is pretty thick. But there’s such an overwhelming taste of chocolate that I had a hard time even tasting the chip. The chips were not crunchy, and I didn’t get a hint of salt until the fifth chip in. And the fact that they are wavy Lays doesn’t even matter – you couldn’t even tell thanks to the chocolate.
Remember those almond bits? Yeah, I don’t either. I couldn’t get a distinct taste from even the few that I did see. Basically, if I wanted the same experience, I’d just have a Hershey’s chocolate bar.
I wanted to love these. I really did. While I did love the chocolate, I can’t help but feel that chip and chocolate’s marriage just isn’t working out and I’m not sure who should get the almond bits in the divorce.
(Nutrition Facts – 1 oz (about 5 chips) – 160 calories, 80 calories from fat, 9 grams of fat, 4.5 grams of saturated fat, 0 grams of trans fat, less than 5 milligrams of cholesterol, 45 milligrams of sodium, 17 grams of carbohydrates, less than 1 gram of fiber, 12 grams of sugar, and 2 grams of protein..)
Purchased Price: $3.99
Size: 4 3/4 oz. bag
Purchased at: Target
Rating: 4 out of 10
Pros: Chocolate. Enough said.
Cons: Lack of almond bits, lack of chip prominence, lack of crunch. Not enough chips in the bag to make the $3.99 price tag worth it.
If you want to have these done right, I highly recommend Esther Price. The chocolate covered chips are absolutely awesome, decadent and indulgent, just like they should be.
http://www.estherprice.com/product/chocolate-covered-potato-chips/Chocolate_Potato_Chips_Pretzels
> But there’s such an overwhelming taste of chocolate that I had a hard time even tasting the chip.
> The chocolate didn’t even cover the entire potato chip, unless the chip was on the smaller side. Strike Two.
Those two points are related. The chocolate doesn’t cover the whole chip so you have a better chance of tasting the chip. It’s supposed to cover only one side of the chip by design.
Hi Thistle,
I guess in my opinion “covered” means it should be on the entire chip, but to each his own, right?
Granted the almond bits are basically pointless but these chips are still delightful. Who cares if they arent completely covered when you factor in the thickness of the coating, and it’s a tasty coating at that. Knock them a few points if you must, but no way these are 4 out of 10.
I think that the best idea would be toffeeing the almonds and then top it off for extra crunch
these chips slap. my life has a whole new meaning.