QUICK REVIEW: Peeps Delights Lemon Sherbet and Orange Sherbet

Peeps Delights Lemon Sherbet and Orange Sherbet

What are they?

More new Peeps for Easter in flavors that I’ve never thought of as “Easter” or “Spring.” One has lemon sherbet flavored marshmallow dipped in decadent creme flavored fudge. And the other has everything the previous sentence has, except replace “lemon” with “orange.” The fudge is what makes them “Delights.” It also makes them messy to eat on an unusually warm spring day.

How are they?

First of all, don’t eat the marshmallow part by itself, which means biting off the head. There are two reasons why you shouldn’t do that. One, I don’t taste much of either the lemon or orange. Two, it freaks the crap out of the other Peeps sitting in the plastic tray.

Peeps Delights Lemon Sherbet and Orange Sherbet 2

The packaging says the fruity flavor is in the marshmallow, but why is it that nibble, lick, or scalp off the fudge and eat it, it has more fruitiness than the squishy mallow? But only weirdoes are going to nibble, lick, or scalp off the fudge and bite only the head off. When eaten whole, both Peeps taste very much like their respective sherbets. I even taste a bit of dairy.

Is there anything else I need to know?

Peeps Delights Lemon Sherbet and Orange Sherbet 3

The sherbet-ness sticks around in the mouth for many minutes after finishing either one. Also, as much as like them, I don’t feel compelled to buy them again. Maybe that’s the case with all Peeps and why the brand keep coming out with new Peeps for Easter in flavors that I’ve never thought of as “Easter” or “Spring.”

Conclusion:

It’s eerie how well Peeps replicated lemon and orange sherbet. They’re both really good and definitely worth a purchase. They’re only available for a limited time and who knows if they’ll be back next year. So enjoy them while you can.

Purchased Price: $1.66 each
Size: 3 chicks
Purchased at: Target
Rating: 8 out of 10
Nutrition Facts: (3 chicks) 160 calories, 3.5 grams of fat, 3 grams of saturated fat, 0 grams of trans fat, 0 milligrams of cholesterol, 15 milligrams of sodium, 32 grams of carbohydrates, 0 grams of fiber, 29 grams of sugar, and 1 gram of protein.

REVIEW: Rolo Frozen Dairy Dessert Cones and Sandwiches

Rolo Frozen Dairy Dessert Cones and Sandwiches

In honor of the new Rolo Frozen Dairy Dessert Cones and Sandwiches, let’s go through a quick timeline:

Summer 2001: A young Tiffany tries her first Rolo, thinks the chewy caramel and milk chocolate combination is pretty good, but wonders why the shape oddly resembles a potty training seat.

June 2011: Nestle decided to try to make Rolo and ice cream happen – behold the Rolo McFlurry!

March 2016: The McFlurry did okay, so Nestle launched Dreyer’s Rolo Ice Cream

January 2018: The next evolution of Rolo ice cream — cones and sandwiches!

Moving on up in the world, R!

Takeaways?

First, Rolos completely fell off my radar until now; it’s probably because peanut butter and chocolate took the spotlight for a while. Second, it’s kind of strange to launch a new ice cream flavor when three-fourths of the U.S. is still frozen from winter. But, luckily, I think ice cream tastes best when it’s 30 degrees outside. Anyone else?

Rolo Frozen Dairy Dessert Cones and Sandwiches 6

Being the eager beaver, I scarfed down one cone, one sandwich, and an entire Rolo roll in one sitting. I started with the cone simply because of the packaging, which looks like Nestle’s Drumsticks but in a different outfit. As for the sandwich’s packaging, no one will care about it because it was a sad plastic sight next to the full-color cone.

Rolo Frozen Dairy Dessert Cones and Sandwiches 2

Although the cone’s packaging was pretty, it was hard to get off. There was some chocolate ice cream and caramel stuck on the side and it broke off the best part – the chocolate nugget at the bottom of the cone. While I rescued it, eating the chocolate nugget first felt all wrong. Order of operations, Nestle!

Rolo Frozen Dairy Dessert Cones and Sandwiches 3

I enjoyed the top part of the cone with the chocolate frozen dairy dessert and caramel. It reminded me of a Rolo without the caramel stuck in my teeth. Then, I got to the vanilla part and chocolatey cone. These elements added nothing but sweetness. The cone tasted more like a standard sugar cone AND, while there was a crunching sound, it was soggy!

I loved three-eighths of the cone – the chocolate and caramel top and the chocolate nugget bottom – but the other five-eighths was disappointing.

Rolo Frozen Dairy Dessert Cones and Sandwiches 4

I had even lower expectations for the sandwich. I took it out of the plastic and thought, “What makes this Rolo again?” It looked like a regular vanilla ice cream sandwich. I had to re-read the box to remind myself it was caramel swirled into caramel frozen dairy dessert that didn’t even look caramel colored. It was plain white, but it definitely tasted sweeter than vanilla.

Rolo Frozen Dairy Dessert Cones and Sandwiches 5

The only flavor I could really discern was the chocolate cookie. So it reminded me of eating a sweeter version of a Carnation ice cream sandwich. Nothing about this was Rolo-y.

Final Takeaway? If you’re craving a Rolo, just eat the candy (or the top part of the cone).

(Nutrition Facts – Cones – 180 calories, 6 grams of fat, 10 milligrams of cholesterol, 90 milligrams of sodium, 29 grams of carbohydrates, 20 grams of sugar, and 2 grams of protein. Sandwich – 120 calories, 3 grams of fat, less than 5 milligrams of cholesterol, 110 milligrams of sodium, 22 grams of carbohydrates, 13 grams of sugar, and 1 grams of protein.)

Purchased Price: $4.49 each
Size: 4 cones or 5 sandwiches per box
Purchased at: Kroger
Rating: 5 out of 10 (Cone)
Rating: 4 out of 10 (Sandwich)
Pros: Nice packaging on the cone! Top part of the chocolate/caramel on the cone was great – like a Rolo without caramel getting stuck in my teeth. The chocolate nugget. I like frozen dairy dessert’s fluffier, lighter texture.
Cons: Cone packaging was hard to get off – broke off the chocolate nugget. Vanilla and chocolately cone added nothing but sweetness. Sandwich was a disappointment – just like a sweeter version of a Carnation ice cream sandwich.

QUICK REVIEW: Limited Edition Peeps Oreo Cookies with Chocolate Wafers (2018)

Limited Edition Peeps Oreo Cookies with Chocolate Wafers  2018

What is it?

Last year, Nabisco debuted Peeps Oreo with Golden wafers and a pink Peeps marshmallow flavored creme. This year, it’s been replaced with one that has chocolate wafers and a purple Peeps marshmallow flavored creme. I can only assume this was decided by sticking both in a microwave oven, arming them with toothpicks, and letting them battle in a Peeps Wars.

How is it?

Limited Edition Peeps Oreo Cookies with Chocolate Wafers  2018 2

The creme’s flavor does sort of remind me of a Peeps marshmallow. Inside the creme, there are crunchy granules that are like a Peeps’ coating. They’re quite neat, but eating the cookie whole causes them to get outcrunched by the wafers, making them barely noticeable. Speaking of losing things that make the creme special, the chocolate wafers overwhelm whatever marshmallow-like flavor there is. Sometimes I get a bit of the Peeps flavor, but most of the time I keep thinking it tastes like a regular Oreo, although not as cloying.

Is there anything else I need to know?

All right, let’s get the poop out of the way. I ate five in one sitting, let it digest, let nature do its thing, and I ended up with normal poop. It didn’t turn my poop a different shade, like last year’s pink one did.

Limited Edition Peeps Oreo Cookies with Chocolate Wafers  2018 3

The wafers have Easter designs on them now — a Peeps chick or bunny. I must admit they’re super adorbs. I’ll be honest, these should be the default spring/Easter Oreo cookie instead of the regular Spring Oreo with yellow colored creme. Who buys those anyway? Let me see your hands.

Conclusion:

This iteration of Peeps Oreo is better and worse than the original one. Not causing people to freak out over bowel movements is definitely a plus, but I felt those pink ones better captured the Peeps flavor because of the Golden wafers, which don’t get in the way of the creme’s flavor.

Purchased Price: $3.50
Size: 10.7 oz.
Purchased at: Times Supermarket
Rating: 6 out of 10
Nutrition Facts: (2 cookies) 140 calories, 6 grams of fat, 2 grams of saturated fat, 0 grams of trans fat, 0 milligrams of cholesterol, 85 milligrams of sodium, 21 grams of carbohydrates, 0 grams of fiber, 13 grams of sugar, and less than 1 gram of protein.

REVIEW: Ben & Jerry’s Truffles Ice Cream

Ben  Jerry s Truffles Ice Cream

My relationship with Ben & Jerry’s goes way back. Our Facebook status would be “It’s Complicated” because of its on again/off again nature. While in college, a cone of Ben & Jerry’s Cherry Garcia was a splurge compared to the soft-serve offered on campus. While I lived in Mexico, I often longed for a scoop of Vermont gold instead of the frozen vegetable shortening offered by Nestle.

Our relationship back then was intense and passionate. These days, though, Ben & Jerry’s has taken a back seat to a more sultry suitor, Talenti.

Ice cream is my favorite food group and I’m not picky. If it’s cold, sweet, and creamy, I’m generally content. Until recently, Ben & Jerry’s distinguished itself from other brands for something I refer to as the “eat-in-one-sitting” factor. Their ice creams usually rate high on that factor and recently, when I’ve picked a pint of Pistachio Pistachio, I’m reminded of the steadfastness of my relationship with Ben & Jerry’s.

I was hoping that Ben & Jerry’s new Truffles line would woo me back to ice cream brand fidelity with the promise of a sweet lover’s whammy: ice cream and a decadent confection together. The Truffles line has three flavors: Caramel Chocolate Cheesecake, Chillin’ the Roast, and Chocolate Shake It! After trying these new flavors, our status is still “It’s Complicated.”

Chocolate Shake It Truffles

Ben  Jerry s Chocolate Shake It Truffles Ice Cream

I started with this one because I’m not a big fan of malt flavors (except in beer) so I had low expectations and wanted to get it out of the way. I was wrong. It turned out to be my favorite of the three and the only one I felt compelled to eat the whole pint in one sitting. The chocolate malt milkshake ice cream base was mildly malt flavored, more like milk chocolate with a hint of malt. The marshmallow ribbons were gooey but not sticky.

Ben  Jerry s Chocolate Shake It Truffles Ice Cream 2

The truffles had a dark chocolate cookie coating with a pronounced roasted (burnt?) flavor and were evenly balanced throughout the pint. Each spoonful of ice cream was more reminiscent of s’mores than Whopper malt balls. For someone like myself who doesn’t like malt, this was a plus. This was the most balanced flavor combination of the three.

Chillin’ the Roast Truffles

Ben  Jerry s Chillin the Roast Truffles Ice Cream

The coffee ice cream base had a distinct coffee flavor, not overpowering but definitely obvious. It reminded me of what my coffee tastes like when it has been sitting out for a few hours, half-and-half mildly soured.

Ben  Jerry s Chillin the Roast Truffles Ice Cream 2

The truffles had the same coating as Chocolate Shake It! but with a dense rum-laced liqueur core. The fudge swirls were unremarkable and did not seem elemental to this flavor mashup. The truffles were less evenly distributed in this flavor than in the other two flavors, though, overall, they were my favorite, especially when eaten separately from the ice cream base. This flavor was a nice change from plain ol’ coffee ice cream, but too intense for whole pint-bingeing.

Caramel Chocolate Cheesecake Truffles

Ben  Jerry s Caramel Chocolate Cheesecake Truffles Ice Cream

In theory, this one sounded amazing. In practice, it was very disappointing. I kept looking at the label to remind myself of what Ben & Jerry’s was trying to achieve. What flavor was the ice cream base? Oh. Caramel Cheesecake? Okaaay. The truffles? Cheesecake? Oh really?

Ben  Jerry s Caramel Chocolate Cheesecake Truffles Ice Cream 2

The graham cracker coating on these truffles disintegrated easily into the ice cream base, leaving a marble-sized pellet of frozen coconut oil. The “cheesecake” core tasted like coconut oil with lemon notes. The chocolate swirl didn’t meld well with rest of the flavor elements, perhaps because the flavor of the cheesecake truffle was so strong. Perhaps a caramel swirl would have been better suited? I tried this one last, fully expecting to eat it in one sitting. Alas, it’s one of a few ice creams I’ve ever tasted where I was not compelled to eat more than just the recommended serving. Ben & Jerry’s, you have betrayed me.

(Nutrition Facts – 1/2 cup – Caramel Chocolate Cheesecake – 300 calories, 19 grams of fat, 10 grams of saturated fat, 65 milligrams of cholesterol, 100 milligrams of sodium, 28 grams of carbohydrates, 23 grams of sugars, and 4 grams of protein. Chillin’ The Roast – 270 calories, 17 grams of fat, 12 grams of saturated fat, 70 milligrams of cholesterol, 90 milligrams of sodium, 25 grams of carbohydrates, 23 grams of sugars, and 5 grams of protein. Chocolate Shake It! – 260 calories, 15 grams of fat, 10 grams of saturated fat, 60 milligrams of cholesterol, 65 milligrams of sodium, 28 grams of carbohydrates, 23 grams of sugars, and 4 grams of protein.)

Purchased Price: $4.69 each
Size: 1 pint
Purchased at: Food Lion
Rating: 8 out of 10 (Chocolate Shake It!)
Rating: 7 out of 10 (Chillin’ the Roast)
Rating: 4 out of 10 (Caramel Chocolate Cheesecake)
Pros: Ice cream and fancy candy together. Unique additions to otherwise common ice cream flavors.
Cons: Pronounced coconut oil flavor in some truffle bites. Ice cream base flavors that are just “meh.”

QUICK REVIEW: Trolli James Harden Collector Edition Sour Brite Sneaks

Trolli James Harden Collector Edition Sour Brite Sneaks

What is it?

It’s Trolli Sour Brite candy in the shape of James Harden’s Adidas shoe. To be honest, I never noticed his shoes because I can’t stop looking at his beard and fall-away 3-point shot. But a quick glance at the Adidas website shows that the gummies do look like his shoe. There are three flavors available: lime-raspberry (green and purple), lemon-berry punch (yellow and purple), and strawberry-blackberry (red and a color that’s not black, teal).

How is it?

Trolli James Harden Collector Edition Sour Brite Sneaks 2

I happily ate through the entire bag, but the flavor combinations aren’t memorable and they’re noticeably less sour and flavorful than Trolli’s Sour Brite Crawlers. While the flavors aren’t as bold, I could determine which flavors are which in a blind taste test. Not bragging, just saying. I can’t pick a favorite flavor because they’re all equally pleasant and unimpressive. Lemon-berry punch is a little floral, lime-raspberry has an initial weirdness to it before it settles into a decent fruity flavor, and I have no complaints or grand praise for strawberry-blackberry.

Is there anything else I need to know?

Trolli James Harden Collector Edition Sour Brite Sneaks 3

I want to get an icing pen so I can draw the three Adidas lines on every shoe. Also, it’s hard to notice, but there are left and right gummi shoes. According to Trolli, the candy comes in color combinations you might find on actual basketball shoes. There are about 20 pieces per bag, or 10 pairs, so I guess if you ever want to open a Foot Locker for Sour Patch Kids, you can do so with these.

Conclusion:

Trolli James Harden Collector Edition Sour Brite Sneaks are cool to look at, but I can’t say I’m impressed with their flavor. Go get a bag of Sour Brite Crawlers instead.

DISCLOSURE: I received free samples from Trolli. Receiving them for free did not influence my review.

Purchased Price: FREE
Size: 4.25 oz. bag
Purchased at: Received from Trolli
Rating: 6 out of 10
Nutrition Facts: (5 pieces) 90 calories, 0 grams of fat, 35 milligrams of sodium, 22 grams of carbohydrates, 13 grams of sugar, and 1 gram of protein.

Scroll to Top