REVIEW: Hostess Suzy Q’s (2018)

Hostess Suzy Q s  2018

Suzy Q Review: Take 2.

Back in 2015, I reviewed the re-release of Hostess’s Suzy Q’s and absolutely hated them. To this day they’re the lowest rated food I’ve ever had the (dis)pleasure of reviewing for this site.

I remember being timid when submitting the negative review, thinking the comments section would light me up for blaspheming a classic snack cake. Thankfully, everyone kinda agreed. We all seemed to have some Q’s for Suzy.

There was a social media outcry for Hostess to fix their mistake, and they did, by re-re-releasing Suzy Q’s.

Guess what folks? They’ve now gone and *REEEEE-MIXXXX* re-re-re-released them.

Here we are in 2018 and Suzy is finally back and better than ever? Let’s find out. Everyone deserves a fourth chance.

Hostess snack cakes all have the same welcoming smell of oily processed chocolate goodness, so these started out on the right foot. The smell instantly put me in mind of a Drake’s Devil Dog. These even look like a Devil Dog’s stubbier little sister.

These new Suzy Q’s boast 50 percent more cake, and 50 percent more crème. I’ll let you do the math there. I will not fat shame Suzy, but I do feel the need to shame Hostess.

Hostess Suzy Q s  2018 2

Hostess Suzy Q s  2018 3

Hostess Suzy Q s  2018 4

While the cake is spongy and moist enough, there’s too much of it. Sadly, it’s still the highlight here.

The crème is out of control. There’s wayyyyy too much crème. It’s thick, slightly gritty, cloying, and overbearing after two bites.

After the first bite, I was ready to say these tasted like Hostess’s famous cupcakes without the top coating and swirl, a.k.a. the best part. After the second less pleasurable bite, I knew exactly what these tasted like – Whoopie Pies.

Are you all familiar with Whoopie Pies?

My mother used to go to Pennsylvania Dutch Country and buy these Amish-made hockey puck-sized Whoopie Pies and that’s exactly what these put me in mind of. That may not exactly help you, but if you’ve ever had a Whoopie Pie from a Farmer’s Market type place, that’s a circular Suzy Q. They basically taste like a more processed knockoff of Whoopie Pies, and I was never a big fan of those to begin with.

For those reasons, Suzy Q’s almost taste like another company trying to mimic Hostess’ formula. I realize these were one of the O.G. Hostess cakes, so maybe I’m just not well versed in Hostess’ taste history.

In the end, these were an improvement from the last time, but I still think they’re in the bottom rung of Hostess products. The previous duds were definitely a more manageable size. With all the variety on shelves, I see no reason to ever buy Suzy Q’s.

Suzy Q, baby, I don’t like you.

I’m gonna freeze the rest of the box, because I feel like the crème will taste a little better cold and hardened, like my soul.

(Nutrition Facts – 1 cake – 260 calories, 100 calories from fat, 11 grams of fat, 5 grams of saturated fat, 0 grams of trans fat, 5 milligrams of cholesterol, 520 milligrams of sodium, 38 grams of carbohydrates, 0 grams of dietary fiber, 27 grams of sugar and 2 grams of protein..)

Purchased Price: $2.97
Size: 15.66 oz. (6 cakes)
Purchased at: Walmart
Rating: 5 out of 10
Pros: Much better than last time. Extra point in rating for Hostess admitting to its mistakes. I’ll probably like these better when I find ’em in the back of the freezer in a couple months. CCR is the greatest American rock band, don’t @ me.
Cons: Way too much crème. Too much cake. Tastes like a Whoopie Pie knockoff. Fool me twice, shame on me.

10 thoughts to “REVIEW: Hostess Suzy Q’s (2018)”

  1. I’ve never liked Suzy-Qs, going back to the late 60s. My mom bought these, because for some reason they were always on sale. Not the other, better Hostess snacks, just these things. Probably one of the few cake-type items I’ve never liked, since I generally love all things cake.

  2. Disagree with this review but hey if we were all alike it would be a dull world. I posted my mini review on the spotted on shelves post on this product a week or so ago. But suffice it to say I would give these an 8 out of 10 and a HUGE improvement over the 2015 iteration!

  3. I tried them and while they may not be the same as the original version they are still way better than the first comeback and the cake is much closer to the original plus it has the most crème filling of all Hostess snacks which is awesome but it is also more like a marshmallow fluff instead of the cream you find inside of a Twinkie.

  4. I eat boxes of these at my security post everyday. They are delicious. I have to try and remember not to fill up on these before my lunch break. They are really good in the microwave. before I go to work I stick the box in the microwave and heat it up for about a minute then try to suck the cream out before it dries.

  5. Well, while they don’t look as hideously dry as I thought in my comment on the first try…the cream looks even worse. You can just about see how gritty it is by the picture. I haven’t had any Hostess products in about a decade, but will occasionally get a craving for their cupcakes(right from the fridge!). I don’t think I’ll be giving in to that craving now, and it makes me a little sad.

    Another thing that makes me sad: Why TF are Cupcakes so FLAT now?!

  6. These are far superior to the first re-release of the original Suzy Q’s and I didn’t think there is too much creme at all, that is what Suzy Q’s always were after all! Sloppy, messy, sweet cakes of joy! If you don’t like em, you don’t like em. I think they are close to the original cake wise, I believe the cream lacks the beef fat that was used in the originals. But that isn’t a bad thing..

  7. They are much better than before. I do like the cake and think it is about the same as the original. The frosting is too sweet (it is not creme).

    I would give these a solid 7 with need for improving the frosting by replacing it with creme found in Twinkies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *