SPOTTED: Bachan’s Japanese Barbecue Sauce Flavored SPAM

I guess I’m off to Walmart to get this Walmart-exclusive SPAM. (Spotted by Robbie at Walmart.)
Send your photos to [email protected] if you spot something new.

I guess I’m off to Walmart to get this Walmart-exclusive SPAM. (Spotted by Robbie at Walmart.)
Send your photos to [email protected] if you spot something new.

Churro Charge has zero heat, but being Takis, I kind of wish it had a bit of heat to slightly electrocute my taste buds. (Spotted by Tommy at Walmart.)
Spotted something new? Send your photos to [email protected].

If you’re looking to put some Spring in your step, your mouth, or your Instagram stories, look no further than the Iced Ube Coconut Macchiato from Starbucks. While the new toasted coconut syrup and toasted coconut cold foam are permanent additions to the menu, this ube incarnation is only here for a limited time. Combining milk, espresso, and toasted coconut syrup, this drink is served over ice and topped with a layer of ube coconut cold foam and a toasted coconut topping. For those counting, that’s triple the coconut, so let’s hope this flavor profile is a pleasant one because they’re going all in on it.
This macchiato is visibly striking thanks to its thick top layer of purple cold foam. The foam gets its color from ube powder, and it’s definitely a head-turner. I could sense the eyes of many intrigued kids staring at the cup as the barista set it down; apparently, my Starbucks turns into a fifth-grade cafeteria at 4 pm.
Avoiding the chaos, I took my drink to go and noticed that the foam held up quite well despite the walk and didn’t immediately dissipate into the liquid below. The fuchsia foam is sweet and airy, with a velvety mouthfeel and a nice blend of vanilla and coconut. Does it taste like ube? It’s hard to say; ube is described as tasting sweet and nutty, with notes of coconut and vanilla, so perhaps this does actually taste like ube, but it’s getting a boost from the vanilla and coconut syrups the foam contains. Either way, it’s delightful. The little bits of coconut topping sprinkled over it have a pleasant chew, somewhere between coconut flakes and coconut candy.

The first few sips are mostly just sweet, though never cloying, and then the espresso integrates itself, bringing some bitter notes to balance things out. Things get increasingly coconutty as you go further into the drink, and it feels like a true coconut flavor as opposed to artificial or sunscreen-adjacent.
I was impressed that, even though this looks like it could be a gimmicky drink, it doesn’t fall into the category of dessert masquerading as coffee. You could drink this and feel like you’re having a normal, albeit purple, coffee drink and not just a cup of sugar. It’s also worth noting that you will look normal (well, assuming you look normal to begin with) after drinking this and won’t be left with a purple mouth.
The last time I had an ube macchiato, it came from Dunkin’ and was underwhelming in both appearance and flavor. Where they failed, Starbucks delivers in spades. At over $7 for a grande, I’m not sure I can afford to treat myself to this as often as I’d like, but it’s such a playful and enjoyable drink that I can’t be mad at it. If a perfect blend of vanilla, toasted coconut, and coffee sounds appealing to you, ube-tter get to Starbucks before this macchiato leaves the menu.
Purchased Price: $7.16
Size: Grande
Purchased at: Starbucks
Rating: 9 out of 10
Nutrition Facts: 380 calories, 18 grams of total fat, 12 grams of saturated fat, 0.5 grams of trans fat, 60 milligrams of cholesterol, 180 milligrams of sodium, 43 grams of total carbs, 0 grams of dietary fiber, 41 grams of total sugar, 11 grams of protein, and 150 milligrams of caffeine.

Is smashing a keyboard with my fingers a high-impact workout?
It sounds high-impact because when I hit my keys, it’s like I’m a Foley artist creating the footsteps of a centipede. Or I’m like Mozart doing Rondo alla Turca from Piano Sonata No. 11 in A major, K. 331 — but on a keyboard, typing silly wordplay, the word “delicious” way too much, and classical music references that might be incorrect.
Does a keyboard jockey like me need electrolytes to replace those lost from heavy typing? It’s questionable whether I lost any. But if I did, I can now get them from Gatorade in a lower sugar form — 75% less sugar than regular Gatorade, to be exact.

Gatorade Lower Sugar currently comes in four flavors — Fruit Punch, Lemonade, Rain Berry, and Glacier Cherry, because of course, there’s always a Glacier flavor. I ended up with Fruit Punch. They have no artificial flavors, sweeteners, or colors. And don’t get them confused with Gatorade Zero, Gatorade G2, Gatorade Fit, or whatever other lower or zero sugar varieties the Gatorade scientists have dreamed up over the years. Gatorade Lower Sugar is a new product that uses the sweetener combination du jour — sugar and stevia — which you’ve also seen recently in the Pepsi Prebiotic Colas.
Also, what’s the deal with the super self-explanatory name? No Gatorade LS. No Gatorade 3. It’s like no one had a good idea, so they just went literal and called it a day.
For this review, I felt compelled to compare it with the original Gatorade and the zero-sugar version — partly for science, and partly because my fingers probably need hydration from writing this. So I did a blind taste test, and it turns out I preferred Gatorade Lower Sugar over Gatorade Zero and regular Gatorade.

The original Gatorade Fruit Punch has a slightly thicker texture than the others, but its fruit punch flavor didn’t punch as hard and was surprisingly less sweet than I expected. Gatorade Zero had a thinner texture, but its fruit punch flavor hit harder, with a nice sweetness from the sucralose and acesulfame potassium. There’s a hint of artificial sweetener aftertaste, but it’s one I don’t mind.
Gatorade Lower Sugar stood out as my favorite of the three. Across multiple blind taste tests, it consistently tasted the best, and it’s genuinely difficult to tell it was sweetened with sugar and stevia. Without the regular Gatorade on hand for comparison, I could easily be convinced this was the original. The only characteristic that fell short of the other two was its color, but that’s simply the absence of artificial dyes.
Speaking of sugar and stevia — that combination was the sweetener du jour several years ago, too. Remember Pepsi True and Coca-Cola Life? Decent tasting colas that didn’t last, possibly because the stevia was noticeable enough to give them a slight bitterness. It seems PepsiCo has since figured out how to balance the two sweeteners, because whatever they’re doing here works.
Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to work up a sweat typing out these nutrition facts.
Purchased Price: $2.39
Size: 28 fl oz bottle
Purchased at: Target
Rating: 8 out of 10
Nutrition Facts: (28 fl oz) 50 calories, 0 grams of fat, 380 milligrams of sodium, 11 grams of carbohydrates, 11 grams of sugar (including 11 grams of added sugar), and 0 grams of protein.
Here are some interesting new products found on store shelves by your fellow readers. If you’ve tried any of them, share your thoughts in the comments. Spotted something new? Send your photos to [email protected].




